Burlington Stores Inc (BURL)

Short-term

Turnover ratios

Burlington Stores Inc's activity ratios provide insights into the efficiency of the company in managing its inventory, receivables, payables, and working capital.

1. Inventory turnover: The inventory turnover ratio measures how many times inventory is sold and replaced during a specific period. Burlington's inventory turnover has shown a fluctuating trend, ranging from 4.08 to 8.17. A higher turnover indicates efficient inventory management.

2. Receivables turnover: The receivables turnover ratio signifies how efficiently the company collects outstanding receivables from customers. Burlington's receivables turnover has varied significantly, reaching as high as 521.51 in one period. Higher turnovers are generally favorable, indicating prompt collection.

3. Payables turnover: The payables turnover ratio reflects how quickly the company pays its suppliers. Burlington's payables turnover has ranged from 3.84 to 10.84, showing variability in payment cycles. A higher turnover suggests more efficient management of payables.

4. Working capital turnover: The working capital turnover ratio measures how efficiently the company utilizes its working capital to generate revenue. Burlington's figures have shown a decreasing trend, ranging from 6.36 to 38.70. A higher turnover ratio implies more effective utilization of resources.

Overall, Burlington Stores Inc's activity ratios highlight its effectiveness in managing key operational aspects such as inventory, receivables, payables, and working capital. The company's performance in these areas indicates its ability to optimize resources and operations for improved financial health.

---

Average number of days

Days of inventory on hand (DOH) for Burlington Stores Inc have been fluctuating over the past 20 periods, ranging from a low of 44.82 days to a high of 89.51 days. This indicates that the company has managed its inventory levels differently over time.

Days of sales outstanding (DSO) have also varied, with the lowest being 0.70 days and the highest reaching 6.06 days. This suggests that there have been fluctuations in the efficiency of Burlington Stores Inc in collecting its receivables.

The number of days of payables have shown some variability as well, ranging from 33.67 days to 95.08 days. This indicates differing payment practices with suppliers over the periods analyzed.

Overall, the activity ratios of Burlington Stores Inc show changes in inventory management, accounts receivable collection, and accounts payable practices, which may reflect shifts in the company's operational efficiencies and working capital management strategies.

---

Long-term

Burlington Stores Inc's long-term activity ratios over various reporting periods reveal important insights into the efficiency of the company's asset management. The fixed asset turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency of the company in generating sales from its fixed assets, has shown a generally stable trend over the periods analyzed, ranging from 4.01 to 6.01. The higher the fixed asset turnover ratio, the better, as it indicates that the company is effectively utilizing its fixed assets to generate revenue.

On the other hand, the total asset turnover ratio, which gauges the company's ability to generate sales from all its assets, including fixed and current assets, also shows a varied trend. The total asset turnover ratio has fluctuated between 0.82 and 1.37 over the periods analyzed. A higher total asset turnover ratio signifies efficient asset utilization by the company to generate sales.

Overall, Burlington Stores Inc's long-term activity ratios suggest that the company has been efficient in utilizing both its fixed assets and total assets to generate sales over the analyzed periods. The stable nature of the fixed asset turnover ratio indicates consistent performance in generating revenue from fixed assets, while the fluctuating total asset turnover ratio might reflect changes in the composition of the company's asset base and its impact on sales generation. Further analysis and comparison with industry benchmarks could provide more insights into the company's asset management efficiency.