Chesapeake Energy Corp (CHK)
Cash conversion cycle
Dec 31, 2023 | Sep 30, 2023 | Jun 30, 2023 | Mar 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Sep 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2022 | Mar 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Sep 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2021 | Mar 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Sep 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2020 | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Sep 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2019 | Mar 31, 2019 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Days of inventory on hand (DOH) | days | 1,753.48 | 2,176.31 | 1,043.77 | 2,938.99 | 2,036.43 | 155.32 | 30.65 | 27.86 | 42.58 | 20.40 | 17.30 | 83.16 | 0.78 | — | — | 36.41 | 130.78 | 337.69 | 261.21 | — |
Days of sales outstanding (DSO) | days | 24.82 | 22.94 | 19.52 | 22.24 | 44.70 | 59.92 | 78.10 | 90.08 | 73.34 | 79.92 | 64.88 | 71.26 | 51.85 | 41.69 | 26.58 | 31.17 | 42.04 | 37.69 | 38.03 | 44.99 |
Number of days of payables | days | 1,048.14 | 1,231.88 | 1,370.35 | 1,331.30 | 1,342.04 | 1,395.28 | 1,153.51 | 1,042.06 | 936.83 | 582.64 | 486.09 | 399.65 | 14.20 | 12.94 | 1.60 | 22.73 | 486.02 | 653.03 | 712.51 | 725.17 |
Cash conversion cycle | days | 730.16 | 967.38 | -307.06 | 1,629.93 | 739.09 | -1,180.05 | -1,044.76 | -924.12 | -820.91 | -482.31 | -403.92 | -245.23 | 38.44 | 28.75 | 24.98 | 44.84 | -313.20 | -277.65 | -413.26 | -680.18 |
December 31, 2023 calculation
Cash conversion cycle = DOH + DSO – Number of days of payables
= 1,753.48 + 24.82 – 1,048.14
= 730.16
The cash conversion cycle of Chesapeake Energy Corp has been fluctuating significantly over the periods presented. The company's cash conversion cycle is a measure of how long it takes for the company to convert its investments in inventory and other resources into cash flows from sales.
In analyzing the data, we observe that the cash conversion cycle was consistently negative or significantly low in the most recent periods, indicating that the company was able to convert its investments in inventory and accounts receivable into cash quickly during those periods.
However, in earlier periods, the cash conversion cycle was positive, indicating that the company took longer to convert its investments into cash and had less efficient cash flow management.
It is worth noting that a negative or lower cash conversion cycle is generally considered favorable as it implies more efficient operations and better management of working capital. Conversely, a positive or higher cash conversion cycle may suggest inefficiencies in managing cash flow and working capital.
Overall, the trend in Chesapeake Energy Corp's cash conversion cycle indicates improvements in efficiency and effectiveness in managing working capital, particularly in recent periods.
Peer comparison
Dec 31, 2023