MillerKnoll Inc (MLKN)

Payables turnover

Feb 28, 2025 Nov 30, 2024 Aug 31, 2024 May 31, 2024 Mar 2, 2024 Feb 29, 2024 Dec 2, 2023 Nov 30, 2023 Sep 2, 2023 Aug 31, 2023 Jun 3, 2023 May 31, 2023 Mar 4, 2023 Feb 28, 2023 Dec 3, 2022 Nov 30, 2022 Sep 3, 2022 Aug 31, 2022 May 31, 2022 May 28, 2022
Cost of revenue (ttm) US$ in thousands 2,198,900 2,463,200 2,405,100 2,746,800 2,787,800 2,961,700 2,986,000 3,108,500 3,133,000 3,090,900 3,180,400 3,195,800 3,293,100 3,358,500 3,416,100 3,124,000 3,471,400 3,158,800 3,427,100 3,390,100
Payables US$ in thousands 242,000 250,700 252,000 269,500 282,700 281,600 303,200 355,100
Payables turnover 11.52 11.91 12.43 11.80 11.65 12.13 11.45 9.55

February 28, 2025 calculation

Payables turnover = Cost of revenue (ttm) ÷ Payables
= $2,198,900K ÷ $—K
= —

Payables turnover is a financial ratio that measures how efficiently a company is managing its accounts payable by evaluating how many times a company pays off its average accounts payable balance during a specific period. A higher payables turnover ratio indicates that the company is paying its suppliers more frequently, which may signify good liquidity management or strong negotiating power.

Analyzing the payables turnover data of MillerKnoll Inc over the specified periods provides insights into the company's payment practices. The data shows various payables turnover ratios ranging from 9.55 to 12.43. The variability in the ratios may indicate fluctuations in the company's payment patterns and relationships with suppliers.

For example, a lower payables turnover ratio, such as 9.55, suggests that MillerKnoll Inc takes longer to pay off its suppliers compared to a higher ratio like 12.43, where the company pays its accounts payable more frequently. These fluctuations could be influenced by factors such as changes in purchasing volume, payment terms, or supplier relationships.

Overall, a consistent and stable payables turnover ratio over time may indicate that MillerKnoll Inc has a well-managed accounts payable process. However, further analysis and comparison with industry benchmarks or historical data would provide a more robust understanding of the company's payables management efficiency.