MillerKnoll Inc (MLKN)

Total asset turnover

Aug 31, 2024 Mar 2, 2024 Dec 2, 2023 Sep 2, 2023 Jun 3, 2023 Mar 4, 2023 Dec 3, 2022 Sep 3, 2022 May 28, 2022 Feb 26, 2022 Nov 27, 2021 Aug 28, 2021 May 29, 2021 Feb 27, 2021 Nov 28, 2020 Aug 29, 2020 May 30, 2020 Feb 29, 2020 Nov 30, 2019 Aug 31, 2019
Revenue (ttm) US$ in thousands 3,543,600 7,706,000 7,817,700 7,936,600 8,100,200 4,176,800 4,230,500 4,199,000 3,907,600 3,428,600 2,996,200 2,601,900 2,454,300 2,308,500 2,384,400 2,432,800 2,477,600 2,672,900 2,629,100 2,610,500
Total assets US$ in thousands 4,019,100 4,095,100 4,155,500 4,183,200 4,274,800 4,382,800 4,448,100 4,447,400 4,514,000 4,517,700 4,465,900 4,460,500 2,076,800 2,054,900 2,028,500 1,917,100 2,053,900 1,985,800 1,878,000 1,784,800
Total asset turnover 0.88 1.88 1.88 1.90 1.89 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.87 0.76 0.67 0.58 1.18 1.12 1.18 1.27 1.21 1.35 1.40 1.46

August 31, 2024 calculation

Total asset turnover = Revenue (ttm) ÷ Total assets
= $3,543,600K ÷ $4,019,100K
= 0.88

The total asset turnover ratio for MillerKnoll Inc has shown some fluctuation over the period analyzed. The ratio indicates how efficiently the company is generating sales relative to its total assets. A higher total asset turnover ratio typically suggests that the company is utilizing its assets effectively to generate revenue.

Looking at the data, we can see that the total asset turnover ratio ranged from as low as 0.58 to as high as 1.90 during the period. The ratio was relatively low at the beginning of the period, indicating that the company was not efficiently generating sales from its assets. However, there was a significant improvement in the ratio in the middle of the period, reaching highs of 1.88 and 1.90.

It is important to note that there was some fluctuation in the ratio towards the end of the period, with the ratio dropping to as low as 0.76. This could indicate a potential inefficiency in utilizing assets to generate sales during that period. Overall, the trend in the total asset turnover ratio for MillerKnoll Inc suggests that the company has made efforts to improve its asset utilization efficiency but still faces some variability in performance.