Progress Software Corporation (PRGS)

Payables turnover

Feb 29, 2024 Nov 30, 2023 Aug 31, 2023 May 31, 2023 Feb 28, 2023 Nov 30, 2022 Aug 31, 2022 May 31, 2022 Feb 28, 2022 Nov 30, 2021 Aug 31, 2021 May 31, 2021 Feb 28, 2021 Nov 30, 2020 Aug 31, 2020 May 31, 2020 Feb 29, 2020 Nov 30, 2019 Aug 31, 2019 May 31, 2019
Cost of revenue (ttm) US$ in thousands 133,169 126,577 116,445 107,322 97,501 94,496 92,045 88,317 83,670 78,449 75,600 70,270 65,219 62,114 64,649 70,736 74,088 75,241 71,206 67,077
Payables US$ in thousands 9,921 12,371 8,729 7,162 10,464 9,282 7,717 9,917 8,041 9,683 6,667 11,358 10,105 9,978 6,372 8,815 10,215 10,603 6,882 9,541
Payables turnover 13.42 10.23 13.34 14.98 9.32 10.18 11.93 8.91 10.41 8.10 11.34 6.19 6.45 6.23 10.15 8.02 7.25 7.10 10.35 7.03

February 29, 2024 calculation

Payables turnover = Cost of revenue (ttm) ÷ Payables
= $133,169K ÷ $9,921K
= 13.42

The payables turnover ratio measures how efficiently a company pays its suppliers. A higher payables turnover implies that the company is paying its suppliers more frequently, which could be a sign of efficient cash management or strong supplier relationships.

In analyzing the payables turnover of Progress Software Corporation over the given period, we observe some fluctuations. The ratio ranged from 6.19 to 14.98, indicating variations in the company's payment practices.

The highest payables turnover of 14.98 in May 2023 suggests that Progress Software was paying its suppliers almost 15 times during that period. This could indicate a proactive approach to managing supplier payments, potentially capitalizing on discounts for early payment.

On the other hand, the lowest payables turnover of 6.19 in August 2021 implies that Progress Software paid its suppliers less frequently during that period. This could be due to various reasons, such as managing cash flow or negotiating extended payment terms with suppliers.

Overall, the varying payables turnover ratios demonstrate that Progress Software's payment practices have been dynamic over time, reflecting different strategies in managing its accounts payable. It would be important to further investigate the reasons behind these fluctuations to gain a deeper understanding of the company's financial management processes.


Peer comparison

Feb 29, 2024